Skip to main content
      • 62 percent of companies consider national defense to be relevant
      • Only 36 percent have defined clear responsibilities for crisis situations
      • Operational preparedness is still lacking in many companies
      • 62 percent see national defense as a source of new business opportunities

      Berlin, February 11, 2026




      Many companies in Germany are inadequately prepared for security-related crisis situations, even though the majority clearly recognize their importance: 62 percent of companies consider the issue of national defense to be relevant to their business. At the same time, there are significant strategic and organizational gaps: only 27 percent have clearly defined geopolitical crisis scenarios, and 36 percent have no designated contact person or responsible unit. These are the findings of the study "National Defense in Transition" by KPMG in Germany, for which around 350 German executives from twelve industries were surveyed. 


      Companies today play a central role in national defense. Awareness of security-related developments is growing, but in many places there is still a lack of clear routines and robust structures to enable action in an emergency. This is not just a matter of precaution. Those who organize security, processes, and responsibilities at an early stage increase their own resilience and at the same time open up new market opportunities.
      Carsten Schiewe
      Carsten Schiewe

      Partner, Consulting - Public Sector, Defence & Space

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft


      Crisis management is widespread, but operational depth is lacking





      Although 88 percent of companies have formal crisis or emergency management systems in place, in practice these are often reviewed too infrequently: 42 percent update their plans only once a year or even less often. Operational resilience measures remain limited in many cases. Only some companies (39 percent) have established robust emergency plans, physical protection measures (36 percent), or cybersecurity concepts (36 percent). Only around one-third (33 percent) raise awareness and train their workforce. 

      Industry comparison shows major differences





      Preparation for security-related crises varies greatly between industries. Companies in the energy supply, telecommunications, and digital infrastructure sectors are comparatively more likely to have defined responsibilities and emergency structures in place. In contrast, mechanical engineering, healthcare, and parts of the manufacturing industry are much more cautious. These sectors are more likely to lack robust scenarios, regular reviews, or clearly defined responsibilities. There is no discernible uniform industry logic; rather, there are differences in organizational maturity.

      Security requirements open up economic opportunities





      In addition to structural deficits, the study also opens up an economic perspective: more than half of the companies surveyed (62 percent) see new business opportunities in national defense. Respondents see particular potential in the areas of production, security, IT and digital systems, and research and development. On the other hand, slow government decision-making processes (44 percent), political uncertainties and planning uncertainties (42 percent), and high costs (41 percent) are slowing down implementation in companies. 


      Press Contact

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
      Clemens Reisbeck
      +49 89 9282 1722
      creisbeck@kpmg.com