Skip to main content
      • Only 24 percent of companies achieve the highest level of cyber security maturity – even though 69 percent of large companies rate their maturity level as advanced or higher.
      • 44 percent cite a lack of transparency about their own IT landscape as the biggest challenge; 42 percent of smaller companies do not have a complete asset inventory. 

      • When it comes to digital identity management, only 20 percent achieve an optimized level of maturity; at the same time, 64 percent prioritize multi-factor authentication.

      • 49 percent already use AI in cyber defense, and another 32 percent plan to use it – however, more than half are still in the planning or implementation phase when it comes to protecting AI applications. 

      Berlin, February 24, 2026
       

      Cyber security is strategically anchored in German companies. Large companies in particular consider themselves well positioned: 69 percent rate their maturity level as advanced or higher. However, across all company sizes, only just under a quarter – 24 percent – achieve the highest level of security. This is shown by the latest IDC InfoBrief "From reaction to resilience – cyber security rethought," supported by KPMG in Germany. The results highlight a structural discrepancy between strategic prioritization and operational penetration. Security measures are increasingly part of corporate strategy, but in many cases there is a lack of a fully integrated, organization-wide coordinated security architecture. 


      The study clearly shows that many companies in Germany overestimate their cyber security capabilities. In some cases, there is a significant gap between perception and reality. There is still much room for improvement, especially in terms of transparency, data quality, and integrated structures. Without a clean database and a complete overview of systems and risks, companies cannot realistically assess their security situation. This is problematic because it is precisely this transparency that forms the basis for rapid response, regulatory security, and resilient trust.
      Michael Falk
      Michael Falk

      Partner, Consulting, Cyber Security & Resilience

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft


      Lack of transparency slows down resilience

      A key structural obstacle remains the lack of transparency regarding IT and system landscapes. Forty-four percent of companies cite the lack of a central overview as a key challenge. Thirty-seven percent report isolated security solutions without sufficient integration.

      There are also gaps in asset inventory: 42 percent of smaller companies do not have a complete inventory of their systems, compared to 24 percent of large companies. Incomplete transparency makes root cause analysis more difficult, prolongs response times, and increases regulatory risks.

      Identity management gains strategic importance

      Digital identities form the foundation of modern security architectures. Nevertheless, only 20 percent of companies have achieved an optimized level of maturity in identity and access management. 41 percent remain at lower levels of maturity.

      At the same time, companies are setting clear priorities: 64 percent plan to introduce or strengthen multi-factor authentication, 62 percent are expanding their central identity and access management, and 53 percent are strengthening privileged access structures.

      Risks also remain present in cloud environments. 28 percent see data breaches and data leaks as the greatest threat, while 38 percent cite misconfigurations as a significant security risk.

      AI use is increasing – governance remains expandable

      Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming part of cyber defense. 49 percent of companies already use AI in their security operations, and another 32 percent plan to use it within the next twelve months. Particularly significant efficiency gains can be seen in threat monitoring and anomaly detection (91 percent) as well as in incident response and analysis (89 percent). AI thus measurably accelerates security-related processes.

      At the same time, there are significant gaps in the security of AI applications. More than half of companies are still in the planning or implementation phase of appropriate protective measures. Only 2 percent have a fully integrated AI security framework.

      Many companies are already using AI to detect attacks more quickly and handle incidents more efficiently. This is an important step. At the same time, however, the study also shows that the protection of these systems is often not yet being consistently considered. More than half are still in the process of setting this up. Those who use AI must establish clear responsibilities, clean data structures, and transparent control mechanisms—otherwise, a new target for attack will emerge. AI can be a real step forward, but only if security is integrated from the outset.
      Christian Nern
      Christian Nern

      Partner, Financial Services

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

      Press Contact

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
      Lisa Meier
      T +49 89 9282 6632
      lisameier@kpmg.com
      www.kpmg.com/de