The In-House Bank in the Era of Digital Financial Architectures

Globalization, volatile markets and relentless pressure for efficiency present companies with fresh challenges in financial and treasury management. Traditional structures increasingly reach their limits: decentralized payment processes, high transaction costs and insufficient transparency complicate flexible liquidity and risk management as well as the ability to respond to new circumstances, whether changes from acquisitions or divestments or advances in the business model.

This is precisely where the in-house bank concept comes in. It enables centralization of internal payment flows, efficient consolidation of liquidity and harmonization of group-wide financial processes. This is a crucial step toward greater control and cost efficiency.

Beyond classic in-house bank drivers such as centralization of payment flows, cash pooling, liquidity bundling via intercompany netting, cost reduction and decreasing bank fees, today's landscape reflects an amplified role for payment digitalization, stricter regulatory requirements and the trend toward real-time transactions.

Add to this geopolitical uncertainties and rising financing costs that make precise management of cash flows and risks indispensable. Companies that invest in an in-house bank now secure not only cost advantages but also strategic flexibility for the future. A central benefit lies in reducing external bank accounts, substantially lowering complexity, fees and reconciliation efforts. Simultaneously, the in-house bank offers high scalability to quickly and efficiently integrate new entities or markets during expansion into the financial organization – without needing to establish additional external banking relationships. Furthermore, it supports business model transformation, such as shifting from traditional purchase models to pay-per-use approaches, by enabling flexible design and processing of payment flows and internal settlements. Another strategic lever is integrating payment service providers (PSPs) like Adyen, Stripe or PayPal, which enable seamless customer payment processing and centralized payment management.

For the in-house bank to deliver its full impact, it requires a mature technological foundation that integrates all processes seamlessly. This is where powerful treasury management systems like ION, SAP, Kyriba or Serrala come into play. They form the basis for central payment platforms, cash pooling, internal lending and intercompany netting – integrated into ERP landscapes with automated workflows and real-time reporting. Without a robust TMS, the in-house bank often remains merely a theoretical concept; with the right solution, it becomes a strategic management instrument for liquidity and risk by automatically generating, validating and transmitting payment files to banks. This enables centralized control of payment approvals, real-time updates of liquidity forecasts and minimized risks like duplicate payments or fraud. Additionally, the solution provides real-time transparency over foreign currency positions and interest rate risks. Companies can thus respond early to market changes, optimize their financing costs and simultaneously ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

The in-house bank has long surpassed being merely an organizational model. It's shaped by digital innovations and regulatory developments, evolving increasingly into an innovation engine in financial management. Current topics such as virtual accounts, Verification of Payee (VoP)¹, the global messaging standard ISO 20022, real-time treasury & instant payments² and ESG play a decisive role. They are not mere supplements but form the central building blocks for efficiency, security and future viability in payment transactions. Therefore, these themes will be placed in the context of the in-house bank below:

Virtual Accounts: Efficiency and Transparency
Virtual accounts are a central building block of modern in-house bank models. They simplify complex account structures by enabling the mapping of individual business units, subsidiaries or transactions on a single physical banking connection. For companies with global corporate structures and high transaction volumes, this means fewer physical bank accounts, lower administrative costs and significantly higher transparency in cash management.

Verification of Payee (VoP) – Security in Payment Transactions
With digitalization, the risk of fraud and erroneous transfers rises. VoP creates an additional security layer by matching the payee's name with account details. For in-house bank models, this means more compliance and less risk.

Particularly for payment flows with high volume, VoP is critical:

• Protection against payment fraud
• Strengthening regulatory compliance
• Automated, trustworthy payment approvals

VoP is thus not a technical detail but a strategic building block for the in-house bank's future, especially combined with real-time payments and AI-based anomaly detection.

ISO 20022: The New Standard for Payment Data
The introduction of ISO 20022 transforms how payment information is exchanged. For in-house banks, this standard is a game changer far beyond a technical update: it enables structured data, better automation and unified communication between banks, TMS and ERP systems.

In an in-house bank context, this means:

• Higher data quality for precise liquidity management
• Seamless integration of payment processes in real time
• Future readiness through global standardization.

ISO 20022 is, from our perspective, the key to evolving the in-house bank from a purely organizational model to a digital management instrument. Those implementing the standard early lay the foundation for greater efficiency, higher security and sustainable innovation in payment transactions.

Real-Time Treasury & Instant Payments
Expectations for speed and transparency are rising rapidly. Companies today require 24/7 payment capability and real-time liquidity visibility. In-house banks respond by integrating instant payment rails and real-time reporting – for immediate transactions, more precise forecasts and fully digital payment management. 

ESG & Sustainability in Treasury: The In-House Bank's Role
Sustainability has long been a strategic factor in financial management. The in-house bank enables ESG-compliant financing, consolidated reporting for regulatory requirements (e.g., CSRD) and integration of sustainability goals into treasury strategies. Efficient internal financing contributes substantially to consolidating external financing and optimizing capital structure. The right solution becomes a strategic management instrument by purposefully utilizing internal liquidity reserves to reduce demand for expensive external funds. Simultaneously, this consolidation creates the foundation for more effective implementation of ESG-compliant financing, such as through targeted allocation of funds to sustainable projects or utilizing green credit lines. This not only improves financing cost structure but also supports fulfillment of regulatory and internal sustainability goals. Thus it becomes a lever for green financing and transparent ESG management.

The in-house bank is no longer a niche topic but a central lever for efficiency, transparency and strategic management. It unites technological innovation with financial stability, forming the foundation for resilient corporate structures in an increasingly complex world. Companies investing in an in-house bank today secure not only operational advantages but simultaneously create the basis to master future challenges—from real-time payments through cybersecurity to ESG-oriented financial strategies.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

¹ For further information, see article https://kpmg.com/de/en/home/insights/2025/10/verification-of-payee.html
² For further information, see article https://home.kpmg.com/de/en/home/insights/2024/07/regulation-instant-payments