What Canadian organizations should do next
While IPSAS 51 and SRS 1 are not yet mandatory in Canada, they signal the direction of global public‑sector sustainability reporting and are being closely followed by standard setters domestically. For Canadian public sector organizations, early consideration supports better visibility over climate risks and natural assets, strengthens long‑term fiscal decision‑making, and positions organizations to respond efficiently should domestic requirements evolve or converge with international standards.
With the standards coming into effect in 2028, public sector organizations should begin preparing now to ensure an orderly transition. The first step is to develop a clear understanding of the natural assets and climate-related impacts within your mandate. This involves identifying which forests, watersheds, conservation lands, habitats, or other resources fall within the scope of IPSAS 51 and determining the extent to which existing information is complete, reliable, and fit for reporting purposes. Public sector organizations must also look at their governance, strategies and risk management for climate risks and opportunities, and develop appropriate metrics and targets.
Organizations should then assess whether their current data infrastructure can support the measurement and disclosure expectations of both IPSAS 51 and SRS 1. This includes evaluating environmental data systems, valuation methodologies, and greenhouse gas emissions measurement capabilities—particularly for Scope 3, where processes may be less mature.
Given the breadth of these requirements, many entities will need to update accounting policies, asset registers, risk management frameworks, disclosure templates, and assurance processes. A phased approach to system and policy modernization will help reduce operational burden and support more consistent adoption.
Engagement across internal and external stakeholders will also be essential. Finance, environmental program teams, risk and internal audit functions, executive leadership, auditors, and where relevant, community and Indigenous partners should be involved early to build alignment and ensure coordinated implementation.
Finally, preparation for a formal climate risk assessment and scenario analysis should begin as soon as possible. A scenario analysis will require specialized expertise to assess future risks to infrastructure, service delivery, and long-term fiscal sustainability under different warming pathways. Starting this work now will support more robust and defensible disclosures once SRS 1 becomes effective.