Businesses revving up emergency preparedness
The survey finds that over half (53 per cent) are investing in infrastructure modifications to withstand extreme weather. This might include retrofitting buildings to be more heat-resistant, embracing adaptive architecture, or incorporating permeable materials and green infrastructure to manage stormwater runoff and reduce flooding, says Ms. Davé.
Nearly eight in 10 (78 per cent) are investing in data, analytics and technology solutions to identify, monitor or mitigate climate risk.
“The increased likelihood and severity of extreme weather events means we can’t let our guard down,” says Leon Gaber, a Victoria-based partner and National Lead for KPMG in Canada's Critical Infrastructure Resilience and Emergency Management practice. “Whether disaster strikes in remote areas or in urban centres, companies and governments must continuously evaluate and update emergency planning and procedures to incorporate lessons learned and best practices.
“By using data and advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, remote sensors, drones and digital twins, companies can enhance their ability to forecast climate-related events, assess their effects on operations, and respond faster and more effectively.”
According to the KPMG survey, two-thirds of business leaders say they have a multi-year climate adaptation plan with short-, medium-, and long-term actions tailored to their business operations to make their company more resilient, and 56 per cent are collaborating with climate experts to improve their preparedness for long-term climate changes. Some six in 10 (62 per cent) have performed a climate risk assessment to identify climate hazards and 66 per cent plan to do a climate risk assessment within the next two years.
Two-thirds (67 per cent) say last year’s extreme weather prompted their company to develop specific emergency plans, and 62 per cent created an emergency response planning team within the last 12 months.
While most (93 per cent) are investing in climate-related risk and adaptation preparedness, 68 per cent say recession fears arising from the U.S.-instigated global trade war are forcing them to cut climate-risk investments.
“While companies are being forced to look at ways to cut spending due to the trade war, mother nature will not cut us a break because of new tariffs,” says Doron Telem, partner and National ESG Leader for KPMG in Canada, based in Toronto.
“What organizations need is to implement more advanced tools to project and mitigate weather impacts. This will inform businesses on structuring their emergency management plans – much like they do for other risks such as cyber and supply chain disruptions. Climate events should no longer be considered a force majeure, and appropriate plans should be in place to effectively respond to an emergency and recover from it. Best practices would include a scenario analysis for specific weather events, tabletop exercises to simulate emergency protocols, and implementation of recurring training to account for changing conditions over time.”
According to Statistics Canada, the amount insurers have paid out on catastrophic weather events has increased significantly in the last 40 years. Between 1983 and 2008, payouts averaged $400 million a year. Since 2009, that number has ballooned to nearly $2 billion annually, hitting $3.4 billion in 2022 and $3.1 billion in 2023. In 2024, four major climate events – floods in Toronto, wildfires in Jasper wildfires, hailstorms in Calgary and Hurricane Debby in Quebec – resulted in over $7.1 billion in payouts alone.
Yet, these losses may be just the tip of the iceberg. A report from the Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation indicates that for every $1 of insurable loss recorded, $3-4 in uninsurable loss and damage is absorbed by governments, businesses, and individuals.
More than six in 10 organizations (63 per cent) have insurance for some weather impacts but are looking to increase their insurance coverage, finds the KPMG survey. Sixty-one per cent say they are in the process of developing a comprehensive weather impact insurance review. Nearly a third (31 per cent) say their insurance was cancelled due to climate or extreme weather risks and 32 per cent do not have insurance to cover severe weather impacts because it’s too expensive.
KPMG in Canada surveyed business owners or executive level C-suite decision makers at 351 Canadian companies between April 16 and May 6, 2025, using Sago’s premier business research panel. Thirty-three per cent of the companies have between $500 million and $1 billion in annual gross revenue, 25 per cent have between $100 million and $299 million, 21 per cent have between $300 million to $499 million, 11 per cent have between $10 million and $99 million, and 10 per cent have more than $1 billion. No companies were surveyed under $10 million in annual gross revenue.