On 20 February 2025, the draft law introducing Book 7 of the new Civil Code was filed. This new book, which governs “Special Contracts,” provides important insight into the future legal framework and will, if adopted, bring important changes that are of relevance for the real estate sector, particularly in relation to sales, leases, and services contracts.
The reform introduces a coherent and modernized framework, aligned with Books 1, 3, and 5 of the Civil Code, as well as international laws such as the Vienna Convention on International Sale of Goods. In the context of sales, the concept of “conformity” becomes the single standard governing the seller’s obligations. Consequently, where a lack of conformity is discovered after delivery, the buyer will have the possibility to turn towards one unified claim: a claim for non-conforming delivery. The special status of the professional seller is abolished, and liability, notification, and limitation periods are integrated into one uniform regime. Remedies are also consolidated into one single framework, referring to the remedies already introduced in Book 5 of the Civil Code. The reform expressly separates the transfer of ownership from the transfer of risk: ownership may transfer solo consensu, by mere agreement, whereas risk in principle passes upon delivery.
With respect to leases, the concept of a precarious occupation agreement is now formally codified, and this type of contract may only be used in case of legitimate reasons justifying its precarious nature. For leases, the reform extends the central notion of “conformity” to the lessor’s obligations as well. The lessor must not only deliver the property in conformity at the handover but also ensure that it remains in conformity throughout the entire lease term, including by carrying out ongoing maintenance and any necessary repairs. In the absence of specific contractual arrangements, compensation for authorized non-removable alterations (and retained removable alterations) will be assessed based on unjust enrichment. Furthermore, extrajudicial termination by written notice will no longer be permitted; termination must in all cases be sought through the courts.
The reform also introduces a single, unified regime for services contracts. Auxiliaries, such as subcontractors, are granted a direct claim against the principal, limited to the amount relating to the works assigned by the principal to the contractor and subsequently to the auxiliary. This possibility of a direct claim does not only exist for the first-degree auxiliary but for any auxiliary further down the contractual chain. However, this direct claim will no longer be available following the contractor’s bankruptcy. Finally, notification requirements are simplified: a simple notice within the meaning of Article 1.5 of the Civil Code will suffice, without the need for additional formalities such as registered mail.
These highlights reflect only part of the changes introduced by the draft reform. As we await the final, officially adopted text, the full scope and practical impacts of the new legislation remain to be assessed. We will continue to follow developments closely.