The current environment in which pension funds and insurers operate is primarily influenced by European directives that are further enacted into national laws by each EU Member State. Today, in 2030, topics such as ESG, due diligence and IORP (Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision) regulations are now all firmly cast into national laws and must be approached with caution. Compared to countries like the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Belgium is still a very small country in terms of the size of our pension institutions. Not in terms of members, though: about fifty percent of our workforce is covered by pension funds, with the rest covered by insurers.
So yes, in the past decade the sector has grown regarding the number of people who are affiliated, but the number of institutions has not. Ten years ago, all of our members were companies and sectors. They have increasingly opened up their pension funds to other institutions, for instance through group insurances. There were several reasons for this switch. The first is that companies had many more opportunities to reach a higher return through pension funds than through insurance. It also became increasingly important for some companies to involve their affiliates in pension management. This is far easier to do through a pension institution, where joint management (between employers and employees) is common.
Accents
For employers, a fund has proven to be a better way of fulfilling their pension promise, more so than through an insurer. The latter mainly wants to sell a product, which may or may not meet your exact needs. As a business, it was also easier to place your own emphasis on particular factors through a pension fund, for example on ESG or certain social values. A fund operates with its own board of directors, which makes its own decisions on strategy and investment policy and can therefore adapt these decisions to the values of the company.