Skip to main content


      On 26 September 2025, the Federal Tax Authority (‘FTA’) released Corporate Tax Public Clarification No. 009 (‘CTP009’). The Clarification addresses the valuation method under the Transitional Rules outlined in Ministerial Decision No. 120 of 2023 (‘MD 120’), specifically in relation to the disposal of Qualifying Immovable Property (‘QIP’) by real estate developers that are considered Taxable Persons.

      While there are two methods for calculating the gain attributable to the pre-Corporate Tax (‘CT’) ownership period (i.e. the valuation method and the time apportionment method), CTP009 covers the valuation method only.

      As a consequence of the release of CTP009, there is now more clarity on the application of the Transitional Rules for real estate developers with respect to QIP under development. Developers now have clearer guidance on how to determine the portion of the gain attributable to the pre-effective tax ownership period, which is ultimately the portion of gains that will be excluded from a taxpayer’s Taxable Income.

      Transitional Rules on QIP and the valuation method for Taxable Persons under MD 120:

      Under the Transitional Rules, the primary tax benefit of applying the valuation method is that gains accrued prior to the implementation of the CT regime can be excluded from taxation. The relief is calculated as the difference between the market value as of the first day of the initial Tax Period, and the QIP’s original cost or net book value (whichever is higher).

      To benefit from this specific relief, certain requirements and conditions need to be met:

      • The immovable property needs to be owned prior to the first Tax Period.
      • The immovable property must be measured in the Financial Statements (‘FS’) on a historical cost basis.
      • The immovable property must be disposed of, or deemed to be disposed of, during or after the first Tax Period for the purpose of determining the Taxable Income.

      While taxpayers owning QIP outside the real estate development sector may find it relatively straightforward to assess whether they meet the relevant requirements, the application of the Transitional Rules can be more complex for real estate developers. This added complexity arises from several factors unique to development activities, which are further assessed in the next sections.

      Clarifications introduced by CTP009 in the application of MD 120 relief for real estate developers:

      Nature of ongoing real estate developments as QIP:

      As clarified in CTP009, the term immovable property is defined under Article 1 of Cabinet Decision No. 56 of 2023 (applicable to Tax Periods beginning before 1 January 2025) and Cabinet Decision No. 35 of 2025 (applicable to Tax Periods starting on or after that date). Both decisions relate to the determination of a non-resident person’s nexus in the UAE.

      Importantly, the classification of such property under IFRS or IFRS for SMEs—whether as a fixed asset (e.g. property, plant and equipment) or as inventory—does not affect the application of the Transitional Rules relief.

      Ownership of the immovable property before the first Tax Period:

      As mentioned above, to apply the Transitional Rules relief, the QIP needs to be owned by the developer before it becomes subject to CT. In this regard, the FTA has clarified the following:

      Under these provisions, it has been confirmed that for real estate developers, a real estate project—or any component thereof, such as land, a specific property, or a building—whether completed or still under construction, qualifies as immovable property.

      • Land parcels: Land parcels acquired before the first Tax Period, on which construction of buildings commences on or after the first Tax Period, will be considered as QIP. In this case, only the land parcels will be considered the QIP, as these are the only elements of the real estate project that existed prior to the first Tax Period.
      • Under-construction properties: In cases where construction commenced before the first Tax Period and continues after its start, the ongoing construction will be considered as QIP. In this case, the QIP is considered the whole real estate project (i.e. the land element and the properties under construction).
      • Fully constructed projects before the start of the first Tax Period: Fully constructed projects completed before the start of the first Tax Period will also be considered as QIP as long as they are sold or intended to be sold after the start of the first Tax Period.

      The FTA also clarified that any gain arising from the disposal (or deemed disposal) of any element of a real estate project that did not exist before the first Tax Period, meaning it was not recognized in the opening balance sheet, cannot be adjusted under the Transitional Rules, as such an element does not qualify as QIP.

      On the other hand, if construction of a real estate project commenced before the first Tax Period and it extends beyond its start, an adjustment under the Transitional Rules may be available for the project as a whole, as it would meet the definition of QIP.

      Definition of disposal or deemed disposal in the context of real estate developers' business activities:

      Under the FTA clarifications, the meaning of disposal or deemed disposal should follow the accounting principles applied by the Taxable Person in accordance with IFRS or IFRS for SMEs, as applicable. This is aligned with the general principles for determining Taxable Income under the UAE CT Law.

      In accordance with the relevant accounting standards, revenue can be recognized from the sale of real estate under a long-term contract in the statement of income, either over time or at a point in time. If the revenue is recognized over time, the percentage of completion could be determined either based on the input or output method, depending on the requirement of IFRS 15. In this regard, most developers in the UAE follow the percentage of completion of a development project to determine revenue recognition over time.

      In the context of UAE CT, and particularly for the purposes of MD 120 and the Transitional Rules, a Taxable Person makes a disposal or deemed disposal of a QIP in the Tax Period (or periods if extending over several years) in which the revenue and associated costs, including land and construction costs, are recognized in the statement of income. This is important, as one of the requirements for the Transitional Rules to apply is that the QIP must be disposed of or deemed to be disposed of during or after the first Tax Period.

      Determination of original cost and net book value under the Transitional Rules for developers:

      Costs incurred by real estate developers—including land, construction, and related expenses recorded as work in progress—can be used as the original cost or net book value (whichever is higher) to calculate the adjustments, provided they relate solely to QIP held at the start of the first Tax Period.

      For ongoing projects where the construction of a real estate project is in progress and revenue recognition commenced prior to the start of the first Tax Period, a portion of the costs (land, construction, or other related costs) may have already been recognized in the statement of income in accordance with IFRS or IFRS for SMEs, as applicable.

      As per FTA criteria, any portion of the cost already recognized in the income statement before the first Tax Period would not meet the conditions under MD 120. As such, that portion is considered already disposed of and cannot be treated as QIP, it must be excluded from any adjustment calculation under the Transitional Rules.

      Fair valuation of the QIP:

      The market value of each QIP, as of the start of the first Tax Period, must be determined by the relevant government authority in each Emirate (e.g. the DMA in Abu Dhabi or the DLD in Dubai). Valuations may also be conducted by accredited third-party valuers authorized by these authorities.

      Valuations from unauthorized parties will not be accepted for calculating the Transitional Rules adjustment. Importantly, the market value must relate only to the QIP for the purpose of determining the excluded gain.

      Therefore, if the market value at the time of computing the adjustment does not only relate to QIP, it would not be considered acceptable for the purposes of the adjustment under the Transitional Rules, unless reasonable adjustments are made.

      Basis of election under MD 120:

      As per MD 120, the election to apply the Transitional Rules needs to be made for each QIP. As per the FTA criteria, a QIP may refer to either an entire real estate development or specific units within a project. The adjustment on Transitional Rules must be calculated separately for each QIP and aligned with the timing of accounting profit recognition.

      Methodology for calculating the adjustment and its timing under the valuation method:

      In line with CTP0099 and the clarifications provided by the FTA, a four-step process is required to determine the excluded gain under the valuation method for each QIP:

      • Step 1: Calculate the total excluded gain by subtracting the higher of the original cost or net book value from the market value (adjusted if necessary) at the start of the first Tax Period.
      • Step 2: Apportion the excluded gain across the relevant Tax Periods based on revenue recognition in accordance with applicable accounting standards, such as the percentage-of-completion method under IFRS 15.
      • Step 3: Determine the attributable accounting profits, which will require that, if only part of the project qualifies (e.g. where the land was held but construction had not begun before the first Tax Period), the portion of accounting profits attributable to the QIP (e.g. the land) must be determined on a fair and reasonable basis. No adjustment under the Transitional Rules is allowed in a Tax Period where this attributable amount results in an accounting loss.
      • Step 4: The excluded gain calculated in prior steps is applied to offset the accounting profits determined for each relevant Tax Period, up to the amount of those profits. Any unused portion of the excluded gain cannot be carried forward and will be forfeited.

      Key takeaways

      • Real estate developers can apply the Transitional Rules on an entire developmental project instead of unit-by-unit basis. This significantly reduces tracking requirements for taxpayers and the level of detail to be submitted in the CT Return.
      • Transitional relief needs to be carried forward to future years based on the percentage of completion expected in upcoming periods.
      • Market valuation should be determined by the relevant government authorities (DLD or DMA) in the UAE or by third parties authorized by these authorities. Valuations performed by unauthorized or unqualified agents will not be valid for the purposes of applying the Transitional Rules relief.
      • Market valuation must be adjusted for immovable property that will not be disposed of to customers or that is not part of the QIP.
      • Taxpayers should review their calculations of the transitional relief as submitted in CT Returns to date and assess whether the adjustments align with CTP009.

      How KPMG can help

      Given the complexity and one-time nature of the transitional relief election in the FY 2024 CT Return, it is essential for real estate groups to ensure alignment with the newly issued CTP009 guidance.

      Our team has extensive experience advising on UAE CT matters and has supported some of the largest real estate developers in the country in applying transitional relief effectively. Leveraging our deep sector knowledge and technical expertise, we can:

      • Evaluate eligibility and application of the relief at project level.
      • Validate valuation approaches in line with FTA requirements.
      • ⁠Review FY 2024 CT Returns to ensure compliance with CTP009

      For tailored support, please contact your KPMG advisor or the team listed below.

      Contact us

      Koen Desloover
      Partner, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Driaan Rupping
      Partner, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Nadia Batiukova
      Principal, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Neha Jain
      Director, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Arturo González
      Director, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Joseph Halim
      Director, Corporate Tax
      Email

      Nidhin Xavier
      Director, Corporate Tax
      Email