KPMG report: Top concerns for tax leaders on the path forward for BEPS 2.0

Adapted from a report prepared by KPMG member firm in Australia, examining issues related to BEPS 2.0 along with practical steps to address concerns

A KPMG report examining issues related to BEPS 2.0

As the global project to modernise international tax rules nears the finish line, over 130 countries have agreed on a final set of proposals for preventing base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), and tax leaders of international companies have a clearer view of the emerging framework.

Now, as the world’s focus shifts to domestic implementation, many tax leaders will likely have their hands full managing the potential impacts.

Country-by-country reactions

Now that the global framework is mostly set, interest is growing about how individual countries will react.

Signing on to BEPS 2.0 means some jurisdictions may have to, for example, change their existing tax incentives for attracting foreign investment or replace them with grants or subsidies. This could greatly affect tax and financing strategies going forward. Tax leaders need to keep up with the changing tax landscapes in each jurisdiction their group operates in so they can understand both the local context and the bigger picture.

Consistent rules

Tax leaders are closely watching how the Inclusive Framework members intend to see that new rules are applied consistently across jurisdictions, especially when the global minimum tax is concerned. The timing of implementation is critical for tax leaders to understand how and when they will need to update their organization’s systems to produce the data needed to comply with the final rules.

Differences in legislative processes are expected to make it challenging to monitor progress and track when laws come into effect from one jurisdiction to another.

Consistent disclosures

Transparency reporting continues to proliferate with BEPS 2.0, with some organizations are required to comply with different frameworks. These include the Global Reporting Initiative’s global tax reporting standard (GRI 207), the OECD’s country-by-country reporting rules and the European Union’s public country-by-country reporting rules.

Tax leaders face considerable challenges understanding the various rules and reconciling their organization’s disclosures under these frameworks.

Communicating with stakeholders

Tax leaders say that their organization’s senior business leaders are taking a direct interest in the Inclusive Framework’s discussions, and they are looking for answers about how BEPS 2.0 will affect their business.

Tax leaders need to be able to understand and explain how their tax profiles may change under various scenarios (described below) so they can help optimize the organization’s tax position in the changing environment. In particular, some boards and management committees believe that the new rules only target digital operations and delivery methods. However, tax leaders are to help them understand that there are much broader implications for most large international groups. For example, the rules could drive up cash tax costs and reduce earnings per share, and their interaction with withholding and other taxes could affect administrative processes for invoicing, cash flows and reporting.

Complying with the rules will likely require more human and technological resources. Tax function budgets are expected to increase accordingly, and everyone in the organization who touches the compliance process needs to be aware of new data collection and reporting requirements. Existing information systems may need to be upgraded to cope with the high volumes of data, including non-financial information, that must be gathered and analyzed.

Cooperation with finance teams

Close cooperation with finance teams will likely be particularly critical. The latest announcements from the Inclusive Framework contain extensive discussion about the computation of the tax base for the global minimum tax, including the use of deferred tax accounting to reconcile tax and financial accounts.

Tax and finance teams need to consider working together closely to satisfy these requirements and help determine consistency among tax and accounting data.

Employing dedicated project management

Identifying and managing all of the potential impacts of BEPS will likely require collaboration between multiple disciplines across the organization—including finance, transfer pricing, and customs. Given the scale and complexity of the coming changes, some organizations are appointing dedicated project managers to effectively marshal all the specialized skills and knowledge that are needed.

Updating scenario modelling

The reforms are complex and could intersect with existing domestic rules. It is important for international companies to use appropriate assessment tools to model impacts, evaluate interdependencies, and prevent double taxation or other inadvertent outcomes.

While aspects of the rules are still being fine-tuned—such as the safe harbor exception—enough is known to identify which entities are likely to meet the exemption based on their effective tax rate and which ones may not. This can also involve assessing whether a structure may include excluded entities and how certain tax concessions might operate. Previous modelling done needs to be redone in view of the final rules, especially as Pillar Two differs significantly from the initial October 2020 proposals. Tax leaders need to consider revisiting the assumptions and limitations used in any prior modelling and run new calculations when needed.

Once this evaluation is complete, a more detailed assessment is advisable to determine potential additional liabilities under the global minimum tax and whether the company might benefit from making any potentially available elections.

Post year-end review

The year-end processes currently underway for many international companies offer an opportunity to gauge the organization’s readiness to comply with the new data and reporting requirements that the new rules will impose for 2023 onwards.

During the current-year process, tax leaders can identify what information is already collected, which needs to be adjusted before it can be used (e.g., deferred tax expenses recorded at rates exceeding 15%), and what other information may be needed for compliance or to support exclusions (e.g., tangible assets, payroll).

In short, these reforms are expected to have broad-ranging effects on many international businesses, and the timeline for implementation is ambitious. Tax leaders may need to move quickly to assess the potential impacts, advise senior executives and other stakeholders on the coming changes, and determine what needs to be done to comply with the new rules and manage their implications.

For more information, contact a KPMG tax professional:

David Linke | Global Head of Tax and Legal | +44 203 0783842 |


The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 3712, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.