Switzerland: New tax rules for financial institutions in Zurich

A new circular regarding the taxation of financial institutions was issued by the Zurich cantonal tax authority.

New tax rules for financial institutions in Zurich

The Zurich cantonal tax authority recently issued a new circular regarding the taxation of financial institutions.

The circular replaces prior guidance from 2015 and has a retroactive effective date of 1 January 2021 (i.e., for financial years ending in 2021) with a grandfathering period.

The circular reflects recent regulatory amendments and adopts new tax practices with regards to banks and professional securities dealers. The new circular contains the following three key amendments:

  • The tax deductions for value adjustments for default risks of debtors will depend on the regulatory status of the bank.
  • The rates for lump-sum provisions are lower than in the previous circular.
  • A lower participation deduction relief is applicable on dividends generated by shares held for trading purposes.

Tax deduction for value adjustments for default risks of debtors

Under the prior guidance, banks could constitute a 5% lump sum provision for default risks of Swiss debtors and a 7% lump sum provision for default risks of foreign debtors. Banks in FINMA category 1 and 2 (“systemically important banks”) can only make value adjustments and constitute provisions for default risks of debtors according to the expected loss approach as stated in the FINMA regulations.

With the new circular, these banks no longer can claim any tax deduction for lump-sum provisions for default risks of debtors, as previously possible under the prior guidance.

Lump-sum provisions

For banks in FINMA category 3, 4 and 5, the new rates for lump-sum provisions under the circular are 3% for Swiss debtors, 5% for foreign debtors, and 10% for any other unsecured claims (with these banks also having the choice to apply the expected loss approach on a voluntary basis). In addition, these banks cannot constitute any lump-sum provisions for default risks of debtors if banks and governmental entities. When the maximum of the acceptable lump-sum provisions is not reached, a new allocation to reserves for general banking risks can be deductible for tax purposes. The circular provides examples illustrating the application of the lump-sum provisions.

KPMG observation

Depending on the amount of existing value adjustments and provisions for default risks of debtors, this change may lead to a considerable release of provisions resulting in a large additional corporate income tax burden, even if the circular provides a grandfathering period in this respect. Adjustments required because of the guidance provided by the circular must be made at the latest by 2027 on a linear basis.

Participation deduction relief

Financial institutions can benefit from the participation reduction on dividends, regardless whether the dividends come from equity investments or shares used for trading purposes including as a hedge for derivative financial instruments. Under the new circular, the participation reduction principle will not always lead to a virtual tax exemption in practice. The tax authority no longer caps the deduction for administrative costs at 5% and has expanded the interpretation of financing costs in the calculation of the participation deduction, reducing the potential net participation income. This change will affect financial institutions with large trading books, but less so other banks holding equity investments. 

KPMG observation

The circular is applicable to any financial institution with its principle place of business in the Canton of Zurich. The taxation of financial institutions varies considerably from canton to canton, with certain cantons granting favorable lump sum deductions for provisions and reserves for banking risks. Tax professionals understand that there is a clear intention of the cantonal tax authorities, supported by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, to harmonize their tax practice in this respect. As a result, taxpayers cannot exclude the possibility that the new practice of the Canton of Zurich in the circular will become the new standard approach for the taxation of financial institutions in all cantons of Switzerland.

Read a November 2021 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Switzerland


The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 3712, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.