The EU Taxonomy Regulation, which entered into force in 2020, provides a critical tool in the EU’s efforts to achieve the objectives of the European Green Deal. By setting out a classification system, which defines economic activities which are aligned with a net zero trajectory by 2050, the Taxonomy enables a much more scientific assessment of an organisation’s progress on sustainability, which is valuable to investors and other stakeholders. It makes greenwashing more difficult. The Regulation sets out reporting requirements under the Taxonomy, which became more detailed from 2023.
The Taxonomy divides activities into eligible (which have the potential to contribute to one of the six environmental objectives set out in the Taxonomy but which may not yet be sustainable) and aligned (which meet additional criteria enabling them to be classified as sustainable).
KPMG survey assesses progress
KPMG has published a study assessing the progress towards sustainability, based on the Taxonomy, of 291 non-financial companies that are headquartered in the European Union and are included in the STOXX Europe 600 Index. The sample is varied and includes large, medium-sized and small firms, from 15 different EU countries and from a broad range of industries.
Growth in eligible and aligned activities
The survey reveals a positive trend in the average proportion of activities which were able to be reported under the Taxonomy as eligible or aligned. For companies reporting eligibility greater than zero, the average eligible and aligned turnovers were 44% and 21% respectively. The average eligible and aligned Capital Expenditure activities were 48% and 24% respectively, while the average eligible and aligned Operating Expenses were 44% and 26% respectively. All averages were higher than in the previous reporting period, with the biggest difference seen in average eligible Capital Expenditure, which showed an increase of 8 percentage points.
More new activities covered by Taxonomy
76% of all companies in our sample reported at least some eligible turnover, which is more than last year when it was only 60%. This indicates that with more environmental objectives and therefore more business activities being covered by the Taxonomy, more companies find their revenue generating activities being included in the Taxonomy’s set of potentially sustainable activities.
Qualitative information - still more work to be done
Qualitative disclosures still varied in length and content, suggesting that there is still a lack of best practices. Our analysis overall showed that many companies still do not disclose all required qualitative information, similarly to the findings of the previous reporting period. This is expected to change when more companies obtain assurance on their Taxonomy disclosures.