United States – Limited Injunction Issued on Enforcing June 22 Visa Ban
US–Limited Injunction Enforcing June 22 Visa Ban Issued
The Northern District of California issued a limited preliminary injunction preventing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from enforcing President Trump’s June 22 proclamation suspending the entry into the United States of certain H-1B, L-1, H-2B and J-1 nonimmigrants, and their dependents.
On October 1, 2020, a federal judge in the Northern District of California issued a limited preliminary injunction preventing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from enforcing President Trump’s June 22 proclamation suspending the entry into the United States of certain H-1B, L-1, H-2B, and J-1 nonimmigrants, and their dependents.1
On its face, the limited injunction only benefits the plaintiffs and organizations that are parties to the case and members of plaintiff trade groups.
WHY THIS MATTERS
Unless overturned on appeal, foreign nationals sponsored by the plaintiffs or plaintiff member organizations needing visas to enter the United States for employment or to fulfil work-related assignments, should be able to apply for H, L or J visas at U.S. consulates and enter the United States while the June 22 entry ban remains in effect. The limited injunction however does not change the application of the ongoing regional COVID-19 travel restrictions on travelers from the Schengen area, People’s Republic of China, Iran, Brazil, the U.K. and Ireland, which continue to prevent many from seeking admission to the United States.
On June 22, 2020, President Trump issued a presidential proclamation suspending the entry of H-1B, H-2B, L-1A, L-1B, certain J-1s, and their dependents and spouses through December 31, 2020. (For prior coverage, please see GMS Flash Alert 2020-294, June 23, 2020.)
The entry ban applies to individuals who meet the criteria below.
- Seeking entry under one the following nonimmigrant visa classifications:
- J-1 intern, trainee, teacher, camp counselor, au pair, or summer work travel program (note that J-1 physicians, research scholars, and students are exempt),
- L-1A, or
- Were outside of the U.S. as of 12:01am EDT on June 24, 2020 – the effective date of the suspension;
- Do not have a nonimmigrant visa valid on the effective date of the suspension; and
- Do not have an official document other than a visa (e.g., advance parole document) that is valid on or after the proclamation takes effect that would allow travel to the U.S. to seek entry or admission.
In response to legal proceedings challenging the June 22 proclamation, Judge Jeffrey S. White ruled the proclamation exceeded President Trump’s presidential authority and “unlawfully eviscerates” portions of the Immigration & Nationality Act by declaring statutorily-established visa categories as invalid for the remainder of the calendar year. As such, Judge White has enjoined the Departments of State (DOS) and DHS from enforcing the proclamation against the plaintiffs.
The DOS and DHS are expected to appeal the ruling. However, the injunction remains in effect while ongoing legal challenges continue to advance through the courts.
In response to the limited injunction, it is anticipated that the DHS and DOS will release updated guidance and procedures directing consular posts globally to resume visa processing in the impacted categories. KPMG Law LLP in Canada is tracking this matter closely. We will endeavor to keep readers of GMS Flash Alert posted on any important developments as and when they occur.
1 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. 20-cv-04887-JSW (October 1, 2020) National Association of Manufacturers et al. v. DHS.. For an October 2 news report of the ruling, see S. Anderson, “Judge Rules Against Trump’s H-1B Visa Ban: President Is Not A Monarch,” Forbes (online) at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2020/10/02/judge-rules-against-trumps-h-1b-visa-ban-president-is-not-a-monarch/#5b3a46f951cc. (Note that the above are 3rd party (non-governmental, non-KPMG) websites. Providing these links does not represent an endorsement of the websites by KPMG.)
2 These include: the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, Technet, and Intrax, Inc.
* Please note the KPMG International member firm in the United States does not provide immigration or labor law services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
To subscribe to GMS Flash Alert, fill out the subscription form.
© 2023 KPMG LLP, a Canada limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.