United States – Supreme Court Blocks Attempt to Terminate DACA Program
US–Supreme Court Blocks Attempt to Terminate DACA Prog
On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was unlawful, as it failed to provide adequate justification for dismantling the program. This decision should bring a certain degree of certainty in DACA individuals’ ability to continue residing and working in the country. Less clear however is whether USCIS will accept initial DACA applications or applications for travel authorization as a result of the Court’s decision.
On June 18, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was unlawful, as it failed to provide adequate justification for dismantling the program.1 (For prior coverage, see GMS Flash Alert 2019-117, July 16, 2019.)
This long-awaited decision means that DACA will remain in place for now, allowing current and previous program participants to renew their DACA benefits. It is less clear, however, whether U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will accept initial DACA applications or applications for travel authorization as a result of the Supreme Court’s recent decision.
DACA beneficiaries should also keep in mind that the Administration may still undertake efforts to terminate the program through legislation.
WHY THIS MATTERS
According to statistics published by the USCIS, there were approximately 649,070 active DACA beneficiaries as of December 2019.2 The Supreme Court’s recent ruling comes as a relief to these individuals.
For DACA individuals who are currently employed in the US, this decision should bring a certain degree of certainty in their ability to continue residing and working in the country.
Given that the Administration may make further changes to the DACA program consequent to the Court’s decision, it is prudent for current DACA beneficiaries to renew their DACA benefits as soon as possible. Individuals who wish to submit initial DACA applications and DACA beneficiaries who wish to travel outside of the U.S. are advised to first consult with immigration legal counsel, as it is unclear how initial DACA applications and applications for DACA-related travel documents will be impacted by the Supreme Court decision at this time.
The DACA program provides certain undocumented migrants temporary protection from deportation. Program participants may also be eligible for temporary employment authorization. The program originally allowed beneficiaries to secure a temporary travel document known as “Advance Parole” to permit return to the U.S. following international travel. Issuance of the DACA-related travel documents has been suspended since 2017. Initial applications for DACA benefits have also been suspended since 2017.
Upshot of Court’s Decision
In the June 18, 2020 decision, the Supreme Court held that the Trump Administration’s attempt to dismantle the DACA program violated the legislative procedure requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act. Specifically, the Court found that the DHS did not provide adequate justification for the rescission of DACA. It also found that the DHS failed to consider the hardship that program rescission would impose on DACA beneficiaries.
The Supreme Court’s ruling allows for current DACA beneficiaries to renew their benefits. Current DACA beneficiaries will also continue to be protected from deportation as a result of the decision. The Court’s ruling is less clear on DACA eligibility for those who have not been previously granted protection under the program. It is, therefore, not yet known if the USCIS will begin accepting and processing initial DACA applications. The Court’s decision did not specifically address DACA-related Advance Parole eligibility either.
It is important to note that the Supreme Court’s ruling was limited to the manner in which the Trump Administration attempted to terminate the DACA program, and it did not address the legality or constitutionality of the DACA program. This leaves open the possibility that the Administration will attempt to terminate the DACA program through legislative efforts.
KPMG Law LLP in Canada is closely monitoring the Administration’s response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, as well as any changes to the DACA program. We will endeavor to keep readers of GMS Flash Alert posted on any important developments as and when they occur.
Employers must be mindful not to treat DACA beneficiaries’ employment differently than other similarly employed individuals. Differential treatment between employees based on the type and/or period of validity of an employee’s work authorization is considered discriminatory and runs afoul of federal regulations mandating fair employment practices for U.S. employers.
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
To subscribe to GMS Flash Alert, fill out the subscription form.
We respectfully acknowledge that KPMG offices across Turtle Island (North America) are located on the traditional, treaty, and unceded territories of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.
© 2023 KPMG LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organization please visit https://kpmg.com/governance.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.